Featured
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Darkness vs light: being atheist in a Christian nation
VICTOR KALALANDA, Lusaka March 27, 2021
IN a country proclaimed as a Christian Nation, and where a large percentage of the population profess the faith, it is hard to imagine anyone would question the existence of God.
But then, there are some some at the country's public university who find it illogical that anyone would actually believe that God exists.
Such belief is adamantly held by atheists at the University of Zambia (UNZA), like 24-year-old Immanuel Richie—and he does not care what you think of him or feel for him, whether contempt or sympathy.
What is odd is that Immanuel is a media scholar,
preacher’s kid and former Christian.
Tall and bespectacled, Immanuel regards
his atheism, the highly controversial belief that God does not exist, like his
badge of honour and he often has got loads to say when he broaches up the
subject of his convictions to his peers.
In fact, when I ask him if he is an
atheist, he admits without apology, “Yes, officially,” and adds, with
undertones of sarcasm, that “sing me the national anthem.”
He says of himself that “a lot of
people are my friends because I really make it easy. I smile when I’m not
supposed to. I make them believe their shallow belief systems are significant
and they can logically be squared. I downplay my role, [or else] these nasty
folks don’t know who they’re friends with.”
But given his Christian background as
a staunch Jehovah’s Witness and, ironically, as a son of a numinous stentorian
Pentecostal preacher, it was not until he went to UNZA that Immanuel began to
believe that “science and philosophy are the best things that have ever
happened to humanity, primarily because they make lying, deception and
intellectual fraud extremely hard to get away with.”
What could be described as an epiphany
for the third year media and communications student began with his pursuit for
more knowledge and it happened against the backdrop of Zambia’s first pandemic
lockdown.
“How I found myself being sceptical
was when school was closed for the first time during COVID. So I read a book by
Richard Dawkins called the God Delusion. So I started reading that book
because, I was like, um, you know what, let me just see how other people have
these dissenting views, so that I can be able to debunk them and in a case
where somebody asks me when I’m in the field ministries as a Jehovah’s Witness.
That’s the way I approached the book. So when I started reading the book,
however, as I went further, I started to see, ummm, the arguments are pretty
sound and I’ve never seen things in this light. So I started probing further
and then when I started doing that it became hard for me to reconcile, say, the
Bible and natural science. I began to see loopholes,” he discloses.
In his self-declared war against
religion, partly waged through his books, it was thus Richard Dawkins, the world-famous
atheist and erstwhile Simonyi Professor for the Public Understanding of Science
at Oxford, who killed Immanuel’s religion.
As he read further, the UNZA student
was no longer the typical Christian apologist that Jehovah’s Witnesses tend to
be, but he was seriously beginning to doubt the veracity of the biblical
Genesis story and its account of creation, in which dinosaurs and primitive
humans are absent, according to him.
“If we’re going to believe the Genesis
account then we’ve to struggle with where to fit these [fossils] because they
were existing, their bones are there, their records are there. Do they really
fit in or were the people who were writing the Genesis story unaware of what
we’ve scientifically discovered today? If they were unaware then that puts into
question whether they were inspired or not, or were they just people who were
trying to understand the world based on the information they had at the time?”
he says.
On the dinosaur question, Evangelist Simbai says the reptiles “are not mentioned in the Genesis
creation story, and neither are miniature horses, hippos, bats, to mention a
few. But their families are, and the species keep multiplying and going extinct
owing to various evolutionary factors lauded by scientists themselves, whose
simple corresponding theological explanation is that since the entrance of sin,
life to a larger extent became adverse to itself. The very nature of humans has
been adversely affected, and some animal species have gone extinct as a result,
and new ones have come up through cross breeding, amalgamation and adaptation.”
Furthermore, after reading the work of
another notorious atheist, Christopher Hitchens, Immanuel was convinced that it
is not a tenable idea to say the rainbow symbolises a covenant between God and
the children of Israel because rain droplets merely act like glass prisms which
produce the rainbow phenomenon.
He actually believes that the earth
and the human population are just a fluke in the cosmos because, as he puts it,
“If you just go beyond, like, our solar system, which is in the Milky Way
galaxy, there’re other multiple planets out there which we cannot even reach
with our telescopes because they’re so far away. There could be other organisms
living there but we’ve no idea. But then if we’re gonna say we’re part of the
grander plan, we’re designed for some sort of supernatural purpose, I think
you’ve more burden of proof on your side as opposed to someone who goes like,
‘Okay, you know what? I really doubt that we’re part of the grander plan ‘cause
we seem to be an accident.’ ‘Cause we seem so tiny to matter so much when it
comes to the whole space we’re in.”
Most of Immanuel’s arguments and
convictions about the universe may not easily be disproved because despite science
reaching a very advanced stage, “There is so much that we don’t understand
about [the world out there]; therefore, everything is possible,” states Dr
Brenda Namumba, Zambia’s first female doctoral astrophysicist.
Now fascinated deeply by philosophy, cosmology
and the work of atheists and agnostics like Carl Sagan, Sam Harris, Rodger
Penrose, Neil Degrass Tyson, Stephen Hawkins, Edwin Hubble, Frederick
Nietzsche, Charles Darwin and Bill Nye, Immanuel is just one of many atheists
at UNZA, an institution with a transformative secular outlook, despite hosting
people of different faiths, including a Christian Centre opened in 1986.
According to a study by Prof Brendan
Carmody on the nature and role of religious studies at UNZA from 1985 to 2005, it
was with difficulty that UNZA management itself accepted chaplaincy at the institution.
There is at least one pronounced
atheist on each faculty at the country’s leading university, with one of the
most notable ones being top scientist Peter Cheuka, who is currently pioneering
word-class drug discovery for malaria using synthetic methods at UNZA.
“Of course,” Dr Cheuka says, “I’m very
proud to be an atheist. I actually consider the Christian faith right now to be
some kind of bondage. When Christians see me, when I talk to them, they’ll be
sorry about me but I’ll also be sorry about them, yeah, because I know they’re
lost. The journey hasn’t been an easy one because being raised in a Christian
family and then taking such a radical step, a one hundred and eighty degrees
turnaround in someone’s belief wasn’t an easy one. I’ve come to one conclusion
that when we’re born as humans we’re born with some truth that unfortunately
gets suppressed by religion. You won’t believe this: when I was a small boy I
used to actually serve as an altar boy and some people used to think I was
going to become a priest. I used to ask some questions as to why it had to take
Europeans and other people from foreign lands to bring us what they consider as
God’s true message. I used to question why it wasn’t the other way round and
why God would only have a son and no daughter is mentioned? Not even the mother
is mentioned, for example. But I was told there are certain questions that you
don’t have answers to.”
Fully grown and with information and
Internet research tools available, it was at UNZA that the Christian faith of
the chemistry lecturer was “significantly shaken,” he says, “because during
that time I’d an opportunity to access information that I couldn’t access when
I was a boy.”
After reading through the Bible, he
found problems with chapters like Exodus 21, where he believes God endorses
slavery and promotes genocide.
He says of Bible writers that “I
challenged God a long time ago to say, God, well I’m not the kind of person who
believes my fellow human being because I know human beings can lie. So what
assurance should I’ve that the person who brought me the Bible did not lie? I
have never seen God myself, so my fellow human being should not come to claim
that they’ve seen God in a vision.”
Married to a Seventh Day Adventist (SDA)
woman, Dr Cheuka says though he does not impose his beliefs on others in his
home, he says he also rivals Christians by relentlessly preaching his message, including
to his own children.
He argues that Christianity’s 10
Commandments were plagiarised from the 42 Laws of Ma’at, and that the Virgin
Birth is not unique to Jesus but common with mythical Egyptian gods like Horus,
adding that the Second Coming of Jesus is mere falsehood because he believes
resurrection never happened.
But UNZA’s popular Christian preacher, Elijah Simbai,
dismisses plagiarism as a possibility.
“Many examples here could be cited including, but not
limited to, sex as a procreatory tool, which could never be said it was copied
by one people from another. About one half of the 10 commandments present basic
principles of universal application in human transactions of all cultures and
eras. The other half speaks of the basic principles of the relationship that
subsists between the ruler and the ruled. It is little wonder, therefore, that
other civilizations apart from the Egyptian, including the Assyrian and
Babylonian, have similar creeds, the only difference usually being on the
keeping of the Sabbath day holy, since other civilizations had separate days of
worship. Rather than being evidence of plagiarism as others might want to
contend therefore, it must be properly viewed as evidence of the common vanity
of the human heritage historically,” he argues.
Another famous atheist at UNZA is
philosopher Julius Kapembwa, who carried out a philosophical inquiry into the
scientific theory of evolution and Christian beliefs, for his master’s degree
at the university.
Dr Kapembwa finds it unfair that when
the Government taxes him it sometimes spends the money on religious and moral
causes, since as a Christian nation, there is no clear separation between the
state and religion in Zambia.
The controversial freethinker, who is
also married to an SDA woman, says many atheists like himself “started off as
very good Christians, except they reached the end of the road in terms of their
seeking for answers and they found they couldn’t find the answers in theism.
And once you step out of theism or Christianity, as you step out of the box, it
becomes immediately clear that a lot of things that we accept or accepted are
just not up to scratch as well founded beliefs.”
Unlike most atheists who trace their
background to a troubled childhood or having an estranged father while growing
up, it is interesting that these non-believers at UNZA largely hail from intact
homes and have gone on to have loving Christian parents or wives, who do not
seem to judge them.
Though UNZA may still be religiously
obstinate due to its old Marxist orientation, it is a centre of religious
activity on the weekends, when it swarms with fellowships and different
denominations.
According to the last census in 2010,
Zambia had more non-believers than Muslims, a trend that will supposedly
continue given the growing number of universities and the apparent relationship
between education and atheism.
But for most Christians, their
position on atheism and the different types of non-believers in the country is
embodied by the views of UNZA graduate and renowned Baptist preacher, Conrad
Mbewe, who says: “The reason why people want to have this well designed
universe without recognising its divine Designer is because they want to
continue living in sin. The moment you admit that God exists you have to obey
his commandments. Let’s face it: You don’t want to do that!”
And simbai adds that “if God doesn't exist, and there is no
standard of morality that is outside of the human sphere, then there would be
no mind or sense of guilt and accountability, and there'd be no depression or
stress. But psychologists accept that guilt is intrinsic in humans because the
mind, on which it rests, is an ethereal concept which answers to a standard set
beyond the individual possessing it. I don't know what atheists will say this
standard setter is, but I say it's God, although they don't want to admit it.”
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment