Featured
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Fuss over astrological signs makes me sick
![]() |
Astrological sign for people born in March, who believe they're wont to prove themselves and their strengths. |
![]() |
Official column logo |
The Pilgrim, November 18, 2022
There
is a fascination with astrological signs - among my American friends - that I don’t
seem to understand.
At
first, it never really used to bother me. I constantly saw the zodiac dates and
traits in Instagram bios as people described themselves as Gemini or Aries.
I
took a personal interest and found out that I’m an Aries myself because I was born on
March 21.
It
didn’t really mean much to me other than serve as a feel-good discovery. A
zodiac sign often makes you feel like you know yourself and in my case I learnt
that Aries are passionate, dominant and ambitious. Who wouldn’t like that?
The
astrology that underpins these signs can be very persuasive. It’s so popular in
America that people blame their own personal blunders on their zodiac.
My
problem with astrology started when I met a young Black American girl, who I liked,
and I was bent on having a relationship with her.
Eventually
she wanted to know when I was born, so that she could determine my own sign and
use that to decide whether we could date or not. I beg your pardon!
So
I remember joking that I was a Gemini and she was freaked out. She immediately
told me she would reconsider our relationship because her last boyfriend was a
Gemini and proved to be a source of trouble for her.
This
type of thinking led me to interrogate this astrology further. As I’ve spent
more time in the higher education system, I’ve increasingly started
appreciating the value of science over any other method that claims to produce
human knowledge.
As
for astrology, it has no scientific validity because it is based on studying
the positions of celestial bodies like stars and using this to account for
human behaviour.
When
I arrived at this understanding, I lost any real interest I had in the zodiac
and I concluded that there is no way it could explain human destiny or even
determine the fate of a relationship.
My
own belief in science as the best source of knowledge led me to adopt a
skeptical attitude when discussing zodiac signs.
But
for most Americans, the science argument doesn't work. Like the girl I went
out with, they believe that their personalities can be demystified by having a
sophisticated understanding of stars and their positions.
Well,
such fuss over divination is absurd. Personality traits to me have nothing to
do with birthday dates or where the star or moon is on a particular day.
People
behave the way they do because of particular life experiences and the way they
were nurtured. All of us are born empty templates and we turn into either
bitter or better persons based on what challenges we face and how we respond to
them.
Sociology
itself settles this debate in a more decisive way. Studies have shown, for
example, that if a human being is denied total human interaction at birth
they’ll grow up without personality or be able to speak any language.
People
only become part of human society after passing through the usual rites of
passage and having the full benefit of social exposure and engagement.
But
life eventually weaves itself into patterns and these fascinate people. In a
bid to understand ourselves, people, as spiritual beings, have developed
systems to explain certain traits of human nature and this is why astrology
retains its hold on human thinking.
For
me, being a Gemini or Aries doesn’t count. I can befriend or date any person,
as long as their values align with mine.
You
see, such characteristics as being ambitious or domineering are not a preserve
of a certain type of people as astrology would have anybody believe. Almost any
person can take a risk. It all depends on individual aspirations and
circumstances in life.
The
same goes for personalities such as sigma, beta or alpha. Today we’ve young men
who categorise themselves based on these fantasies. If they’re independent minded,
they call themselves a sigma male, and if they are charismatic, they regard
themselves as alpha.
This divination or pseudoscience is deceptive and tries to undermine truly scientific reasoning. The world has no default personality and no number of signs in the skies can explain why you do the things you do. My American friends, and people anywhere around the world, should embrace this truth.
*This column is published every Friday in Zambia's leading newspaper, the Zambia Daily Mail
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Did you know that I have read astrology, too? I have also done numerology. It is not divination, it is a study on the positions of the universal lights--planets--and their influence on your life based on their position at the time you were born. The lights of heavens shall be for signs.
ReplyDeleteHahaha that's interesting, Mr Daka. But I also know that you believe each man has a certain number of soulmates (for example, 5) and once you meet these, you will feel something. I don't really find this scientific though. The problem with astrology is that science does not support it. It's like self-fulfilling prophecy. Whatever you believe, manifests. So it's a game of chance. But there also multiple examples why this is inaccurate on many levels. Please check out criticisms of astrology here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrology#Scientific_analysis_and_criticism
DeleteWhile their logic might not make sense and probably untrue, their emotions are not. Why do humans have such a strong reaction toward artificial identities?
ReplyDeleteDid you ever reconnect with the girl and ask her to clarify her decision in retrospect?